Nope, I've done a full spreadsheet analysis and will be sticking an article up in the next day or two.
Recurring losses, ignoring the one off gains/losses from player sales, are down by about £2 million, if you take into consideration the increase in depreciation, then realistically it is a £4...
Yes, we do have problems such as the transport levy paid to the rail and bus companies (£1.5 million) that other clubs don't suffer from, but by cutting non-playing costs it allows the first team manager more leeway in terms of players signed, so that is a good thing.
It includes a bonus from Southern Rail for getting the trains running on time.
There are three CEO's in the PL who are on over £2 million, and most are on at least £1m.
My gut feel is that Tony Bloom wanted someone to cut costs at the club, and this has been achieved, without affecting the football budget.
I'll be honest, I have had conversations with Paul Barber and David Jones (the FD) and both are very professional, and have answered all questions at...
Potential extra transfer money that could come in from the sale of Bridcutt and Barnes.............................£4.3 million.
Sunderland UP
Burnley UP
Palace DOWN
It makes sense for the Albion if these come true.
Albion losses reduced to £10.6 million
The club has reduced losses by about £4.5 million in 2013
http://www.seagulls.co.uk/documents/doc150115-15012015133454229-2206891.pdf