Search results

Agree to a point, but that would mean TB (who IS the club these days) giving money to people who are already wealthy. I wonder if DK pledged all the money from the share sale to a good cause (AITC or REMF spring to mind) then perhaps the objector would feel he has less to object about?

I don't begrudge DK anything, he walks on water for his efforts IMO. However, other MINORITY investors in the Albion see it differently, and do resent DK getting a large proportion of his investment back, whilst they get nothing, and no credit for their efforts either.

Because the dispute has nothing to do with TB.

If it was 290 shares being sold to 290 fans for £1 each this issue wouldn't exist.

This would be resolved if the person willing to pay a pound for DK's shares offered the same amount to the other minority shareholders.

Perhaps it's not the 'club' blocking the sale, but another existing minority shareholder who is unhappy at DK getting £1 a share? The other investor, who stuck his hand in his pocket during the days before Tony Bloom when it was a knife edge whether the club would survive, is not being offered...