Search results

I'm not denying that, but given the case, it's better to have someone in charge who knows what he is doing.

Because he has delivered a £2million reduction in TB's contribution at the same time as increasing the playing budget, whilst staying within FFP limits. I think the way he handled a certain ex-manager related issue, which was settled without compensation, may have impressed the judges too...

Cut the operational costs of the club Increase revenues of the club Allow the player budget to be increased whilst complying with FFP.

AITC is not a blank cheque from TB.

He is very good at the job set for him by TB, so good to get some recognition for it. Just because some of us don't like the growing pains taken by the club in going from a £7million a year to a £25million a year business doesn't mean that PB is bad at what he does.