Search results

We have lost Bridge and (probably) Upson, so 2 decent signings on top of those two are probably needed. On the plus side, we should have CMS and Hoskins back next season.

I agree, and as shown before, getting rid of 50 stewards will make a 1.5% reduction in our losses, but not even get you one player on an average salary for this division (£350,000 a year).

You said you were being bled dry and wanted to pay less.

Fair enough, you want more job losses then.

Genuine question. Would you be happy to have ambitions of (say) finishing 14th in this division next season, or pay a bit more and go for the play-offs?

Are you genuinely being 'bled dry'?

The reason why there are so many stewards is linked to the safety certificate and ongoing work at the Amex last season. In order to satisfy the safety officer, the club had to employ more stewards than they felt necessary. This season, because there has been a lot of construction work during...