Search results

I don't have a huge issue with what you say, but when Albion fans feel the need to start quoting attendances from every Palace and Crawley fixture I do feel that opposing fans are entitled to a right of reply. As for the board, it's whatever Bozza wants it to be at the end of the day, it has...

As for how many shits I give for a 5% turnout on the vote I couldn't give................it's two.

I do. When I was delayed for ten minutes due to a turnstile balls up against Barnet at Withdean and faced with the choice of (a) Ranting like a little girl at club officials, or (b) Watching the rest of the match I chose (b)

So, when is NSCJD.com going live?

Suspect half term is a contributory factor too.

Why?

I do, and that is why you are welcome on here. If anyone wants to come on here and give it tedious homophobic nonsense they can f*** right off, but you and other Palace fans who can construct a sentence together are entitled to give us some stick after the way we played last month.

Are you so sensitive that you can't cope with someone taking the piss a bit? If so, surely you shouldn't go watch football, the opposing fans might sing songs that take the piss too, or perhaps they should be banned from the Amex, is that what you are suggesting?

NSC is a better board than BBS, so WHY do you want us to be more like Palace?

It has never been light touch 'of late'. The moderating ethos and style has been consistent since NSC was set up. If you want to see the results of more draconian moderating try out Always Skint (deceased) or the Palace BBS. Post something racist or homophobic and you will certainly face a ban...

It's ok cjd, Ken Brown has agreed to join the ranks of mods. :blush:

Sometimes.

No I f***ing wouldn't. Frankly after driving 500 miles to the Falmex and back, I sometimes have better things on my mind than tidying up NSC in case some curtain twitchers get offended because we haven't won yet again and they can't cope with someone taking the piss.

Perhaps he wasn't banned by a mod....:shootself Protocol is that the mod who deals with it posts the reason for the ban, sometimes people forget, sometimes it is felt that the matter is better dealt with by saying nothing. I can't speak for others.

Fair enough, but should be ban our own pricks too? I would reiterate that we have had only 11 posts reported in a week out of a grand total of 20,000+. We can't (and also can't be arsed) check every one, and rely on people to use the 'report a post' facility. Some (and I'm in no way pointing...

We do try to do so. There is a fine line between moderating and censorship. Too much of the latter and you end up with a forum with one person posting and agreeing with himself all the time (not that I can think of one..................

Report it and we will act. We have LOADS of abusive and insulting manner from Brighton fans. Someone once told Andy Whing to 'f*** off and die............slowly' for example. The abuse handed out to DK/Micky Adams/ Dean Wilkins/ Casper/ Ashley Barnes is very offensive and very personal from...

1: I'm not sure how easy it would be to define 'wind up' from a discussion thread. If it is complete shite we do shift to 'the other stuff' anyway. 2: Why the beef with opposition supporters as opposed to wind up threads from some of our own, what gives them a right to do so above someone from...

But surely nothing will do that apart from a ban, and then they can reregister under a different name.

There were loads of SHITHOUSE threads last night started by our lot.