Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. Eeyore

    [Cricket] Is it the end of Third Man ?

    The term 'Man' actually is a catch all reference to all humans though historically. It's not as patriarchal as folk think. It's all down to interpretation really. I think folk should man up a bit. Oh...:ffsparr:
  2. Eeyore

    [Cricket] Is it the end of Third Man ?

    Except that the term 'Third Man' was originally 'Third Fielder' and changed over time- as indeed it will again. II would simply employ the term 'Third Field' or perhaps 'Fine Off'. Kids growing up won't know any different- as doubtless you have probably never heard of 'Third Fielder'.
  3. Eeyore

    [Cricket] Is it the end of Third Man ?

    Doesn't seem in use quite as much as it once was anyway.
  4. Eeyore

    [Cricket] Is it the end of Third Man ?

    No, I've played for forty years and I'm more than happy with it. The sport has expanded so much that girls and women are playing everywhere.So why not make a few little changes ? They are not 'batsmen' are they ? And they won't field at 'Third Man'. The terms can still be used in the men's...
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here