Search results

Almost everyone agrees, he has no excuse for his actions. The issue at hand is what the catalyst is. That is where the divide occurs.

Although he makes it quite clear, more than once, that he is totally opposed to the killings. He also states that there is no mitigation for those who carry them out to be excused, supporting their prosecution. He also answers her question, through his discourse, concerning the security...

Perhaps he was. But then he changed. Often the case. Folk are merely expressing their shock at what has happened to him. Not excusing his actions.