Why don't you put a sheet on your lawn with a message for him. You know, like those naff ones you see hanging from flyovers that say "HaPpy 40tH ANGeLa".
Lets see. Something along the lines of
"Oi Bomber. Sign up or f*** off." That should do it.
Oohh I know, I know !
He added to the squad, whilst maintaining the clubs wage structure, and therefore avoided a queue of players in the summer all asking for THEIR salaries to be increased in line with what would have been a broken wage structure.
Do I win £5 ?
:lolol:
Priceless.
I'm not 100% sure whether my toast had butter on it prior to me buttering it. I suppose it was technically butterless prior to being buttered, but once I buttered it, it had butter on. So technically, its buttered. But I'm not sure about whether it was buttered before...
I'll save BigGully the effort:
*clears throat*
"Yes but we still spent £300k on Murray which was money we could have used on Savage and Hammonds salary demands and that wouldn't have cost the club any more outlay than the Murray fee and then we would have kept Savage and Hammond and everything...
:thud:
Over and out. BigGully, life really is too short. I think you know you're talking bollocks, but you've gone on too long now to back down from your ludicrous assertions.
Thank christ you are not in charge of finance at the Albion.
Sorry, but thats just rubbish. "PERCEIVED" wage structure ?? Of COURSE there is a bloody wage structure, its probably the single most important aspect of the clubs budget. Who do you think we are, Chelsea ?
The fact is, if Murray and his agent had asked for more than DK and the board were...
I dunno Mr Shabadoo, I'm on the point of giving up to be honest.
I made that very point to him in the post he quoted of mine above, but he either doesn't agree, doesn't care, or doesn't understand. Possibly all three.
You seem obsessed by this £300k we stumped up for Murray, and continue to use this as a stick to beat DK and the board with - "if they found £300k for Murray, then why the hell couldn't they pay what Savage and Hammond were asking for ?" seems to be the gist, aye ?
Surely you can see the...
Its not "technically probably right".
its just simply RIGHT - as in CORRECT.
You then go on to say pretty much nothing in the rest of that post. Are you running out of things to criticise DK for ?
Point me towards a third division football club playing at a rented athletics track that is raking in a profit then, genius.
YES we are relying on Directors plugging gaps, which they are doing, have been doing, and keeping the club afloat. What you ALSO want them to do is bend over and take it...