Search results

That we can agree on. Pawson is just inept as the players weren't too sure what he had given. Chelsea were arguing their case as they knew it had been given but we seemed distraught he hadn't given it. And his signal after visiting the monitor was equally ambiguous.

Ask Ashley Barnes is that applies to Pawson normally.

Caicedo should have walked and they should not have had a penalty but the shenanigans around Pawson not signalling very well will get most of the grief on here despite it being a rare occasion when VAR worked correctly as Pawson made a blunder they could intervene on.

Learn the laws. As crap as it was all round, the drop ball was correct

He did a little limp wristed point in the direction of the penalty spot. Ambiguous at best

They need to change the wording of the review so people have some idea of what is going on. Checking potential penalty is useless. Checking award of penalty and checking non award of penalty would make more sense.

Just to clarify - Pawson gave the penalty - hence the review and drop ball as he stopped the game for a penalty.

Send Gillett back to Australia. Incompetent goon wherever he is off or on the pitch. Failed experiment - we have enough incompetent officials of our own

The correct Albion chant. Don't know what caused it but Up with this sort of thing

https://twitter.com/i/events/1714439894536269825

And shut up the gobshite obsessed with Liverpool goals

Who is this 5ft 11 goalie we have?

My new blood pressure meds also help with the prostate so here's hoping.