Search results

But part of the point I was making is that WE DON'T NEED THE CASH. If we were to sell Dunk, it would be because we decide to, either because somebody does offer silly money, of because his head gets turned, (like van Dijk)OR because we decide we don't want to stand in his way.

Isn't it obvious that Dunk is one of our prime assets, star/key players and that we don't need to sell. It would therefore take significant if not silly money to prise him away. If anyone really wants him, they will have to pay.