Search results

I take on board everything you say, which is considered and thoughtful. I am not well-paid, but my wife is. There is no way, thoough, that we would ever have been able to afford private education for our children. And yes, we have always been very supportive of them. One of the big problems of...

I didn't quote any EXACT figures, is what I meant, ither than the £7.50, which I think was clearly a joke. Just out of interest, herewith a previous headline from the Daily Mail which expressly states that Health Tourism costs Billions...

I am not saying children should be denied these facilities. My attitude would be that such good facilities should be there for everyone. You clearly either didn't read properly or didn't understand my post.

In my original post, the only figure I quoted was £7.50, which I said was clearly an underestimate. I did not quote any figures other than that. I think most people would accept that, if you say your heart would XYZ, but your head wouldn't, that XYZ is not something you would have any serious...

If you think the Guardian is Marxist, you've clearly never read it.

Sorry if it was misleading, but my daughter is not a pupil tere. She is 33 and was playing for another team against a Leicester Ladies team which just happens to hire the Leicester Grammar School facilities.She went to one of our local Comprehensive schools, then to Sixth Form College and to...

I'm not sure that I would go along with the notion that public school types feel threatened by threads like this......BUT I would go along with the idea of closing public schools down for all sorts of reasons, although it is never going to happen. Will Hutton wrote a book many years ago called...

Why do you doubt I would challenge health tourism. If people who are not "entitled" to treatment by dint of their status receive treatment, they should pay. The Mail, though, reports such things in an aggressive and nasty way. Perhaps a better example of the Mail's nastiness is the reporting of...

Heart says yes, but head says no. The worst thing about the Daily Mail is that seemingly sensible people take some of the rubbish it prints seriously. I think it is, though, a very good argument for Press Regulation, or perhaps rather policing - being hit hard when it is proved to have printed...