Search results

Same to you!!

Really? Even though I said autistic people deserve 'empathy and understanding.' You are the sort of person who labels someone as 'mad' if they dare to disagree with you. Fair point about the removal of the whip, although in politics nothing would surprise me.

Sad really that you label someone whose views differ to yours as 'mad.' Interesting how casually you throw around the word 'mad' as by your own admission you are autistic which is a mental health condition that deserves empathy and understanding and which is seen as a different condition to...

You're arrogant. There I said it.

Bigot aren't I... We are committed to increasing the representation of women and under-represented groups in Parliament and at every level of politics. We are proud to have more women and BAME MPs than all of the other political parties put together, and proud of our action to tackle the...

Am I? We are committed to increasing the representation of women and under-represented groups in Parliament and at every level of politics. We are proud to have more women and BAME MPs than all of the other political parties put together, and proud of our action to tackle the...

Why don't you then??

And you are someone who doesn't live in the real world, unlike me.

Well if there are 'quotas' to fill...

'Has-been' politician? She still is a politician!! I would also guess one who would stand a reasonable chance of securing a cabinet role should Labour win the next election, hardly a 'has been.' Wow the great HWT somewhat stumped for words and unable to defend a shocking Labour party MP...

No I'm not, the ex Shadow HS interview was embarrassing. Instead of labeling me why don't you defend her interview?

This was particularly embarrassing, she was the Shadow Home Secretary at the time, a graphic illustration of putting diversity and inclusion and quotas ahead getting the right people into the right roles. From 4 minutes on it's gets particularly amusing and embarrassing:

Probably have. No matter what the year the closing sentence is still relevant: 'There may be ambiguous grounds to suggest Abbott is a racist, but there are crystal clear ones to suggest that she is a hypocrite.'

Interesting article: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2082664/Diane-Abbotts-divide-rule-tweet-hypocrisy-Shes-expert-one.html