I think "very harsh" is very harsh. Can you give an example? The thing about possible sanctions for not telling the club about non-attendance (at away EL matches) for instance, much discussed in another thread, is taken from the club's terms and conditions. This 'small print' is never supposed...
I want to agree about making provisional payment with registration to guarantee commitment but I’m unsure about the practical details eg many people might be willing to go but won’t know about work rotas, family commitments etc, until nearer the time—not to mention last minute accidents, COVID...
I really don’t think there’s a "lumping in to have a go" here. The problem with the OP's messages here is that he’s been quite aggressive not just about his perceived treatment by the club but towards anyone who tries to say that there may well be good reasons for the policy. It’s that old...
Sounds like you are annoyed with the way you’ve been treated, and annoyed with the policy, which seems to amount to being annoyed with the club. And it’s ok to be annoyed if you think it’s a bad policy. But equally, it’s ok for people to (politely) disagree with you.
What you regard as "being...
I agree with that except the paragraph about being a spoilt child. The guy is pissed off and fed up which we can understand and relate to but ultimately he made a cock-up and doesn't have much option other than to suck it up. I'm not sure that posting about it is very helpful.
I suppose it’s just to incentivise people to follow the correct procedures and to make doubly sure that they’ve done so. It’s harsh but probably effective. If it became widely known and expected that it didn’t matter if you missed the deadline or made an error, you just call up and get it put...