Search results

The ref didn't see him struck in the face (as it didn't happen) and assumed he was because of his reaction. This should be the REF's fault, as he should be giving what he see not what he assumes.

How long to players keep doing this if they realise it gets them nothing? Makes them look stupid on TV and they get nothing more. Answer - they don't.

Makes you look a right idiot, but yes, up to you what you hold, why does it matter?. If the officials are doing their job properly they have seen what actually happened and either dealt with it or told you to get up.

I'm assuming this is a joke.

I just don't get the whole 'was it in the face though' argument. As I said it shouldn't matter what part of your body you choose to hold when you get injured. There's enough officials in the game now to see what happened, and if none of them did see then the ref shouldn't be giving anything on...

So it was the ref that got it wrong? What law states that you have to 'hold where you're hit' when assaulted off the ball? Who knows what he injured when he hit the ground. Also is it a yellow to push someone in the chest but a red to push them in the face? What about the shoulders or the...