Search results

Pertinent? You mean like his first question: "When will the government proceed with an inquiry into Orgreave?" He knew that it was an off-limits question because straight after PMQs, the very subject of Orgreave was going to be debated and he stayed behind to listen. That was very weak from him...

He could, he SHOULD, have gone to town on May here. There's so much ammunition: "threatening to cut disability benefits is not living within your means when your only means is benefits...cutting essential services to pay for corporation tax cuts is not living within your means and it's not all...

Fair enough although this is a thread about PMQs and it does seem to be of interest to others. I think it will matter especially if Corbyn wins the leadership race because he's going to have to take on the Tories and his own backbenches. 4 years of him fluffing his lines and looking a weak and...

I didn't say he's in it for the money but I do think that someone who boasts about his record of fighting for human rights but knowingly appears on a TV station banned in the UK for broadcasting torture needs to explain himself. You say he has principles like no other politician in the UK...

Regardless of politics, Corbyn gave himself a bloody good chance of embarrassing the new PM and he well and truly blew it. He asked six or seven totally different questions including one on her new Foreign Secretary's racist comments. But that question came at the end of another question about...

Ah yes. Principles. Is passionate about human rights but happy to take money for numerous TV appearances on Iran State TV even AFTER they had been banned by Ofcom for broadcasting the torture-confession of an investigative journalist. http://uk.businessinsider.com/money-corbyn-paid-iran-2016-7...