Well no, as I said we all thought it would be great if we could use technology in football as it's worked really well in cricket and tennis. But the point stands that we don't know how and when to use it, and currently all we've done is add a whole new level of officiating that still doesn't get...
So because people used to get pissed off with decisions in the past they should/must be in favour of VAR? How can you possibly reach that conclusion?
We used to discuss it. We all agreed that technology has aided decision-making in sports like cricket, so wouldn't it be great if we could do it...
I'd accept VAR if it had improved decision making. It hasn't. Referees still make mistakes and on top of that traditional level we've now got VAR making mistakes. And it isn't consistent. It has been a total and complete failure, although it few remaining supporters won't have it and like Trump...