Search results

Fair enough, I stand corrected re the debts. (My fault for believing a Palace fan :)). But yes, as you say my point stands. Simply saying "We've got a Sugar Daddy who paid for our ground and will continue to pump money into us for evermore" doesn't mean we are on a sound financial footing with...

Hmmm. See below: I really don't think we're in a position to gloat when our debts are bigger than Palace's (and it's not all covered by TB). It's a pity that the Palace fans' contributions to this thread are sneered at just because they're Palace. Fair enough a bit of banter about dumb...