Search results

But is it? There is some admittedly (as there always has been), but I think 'swamped' is far too strong a word, and I think the mods have been very good at removing offenders. On the other hand if you'd said "swamped by puerile drivel from 'Brighton' fans" ... I'd have agreed with you!

I know you're a Palace fan, but come on, it's not even up for debate. The BBS is moderated by a load of touchy, thin-skinned geeks and consequently it's an over-moderated, sanitised bore-fest. The mods (and the posters) are the absolute epitome of the term 'Nigels'. I don't want NSC going the...

Not really, but thanks for the reply anyway.

Well I'm not exactly losing sleep over it but since you asked there are three reasons why I raised it. Firstly if it's not going to be done 'properly' and 'completely' then there's no point in having it and Bozza himself has said that it should be kept up to date. When only half the bans are...

Fair enough, gold star - and have a word with the other slackers who are letting the side down!

Whatever, he certainly wasn't a spammer who come and go before the rest of us are even aware, in his short time here he'd made an impact as I'm sure you'd agree! And yes, some other than spammers are mentioned, which makes the 'patchy' nature all the more annoying. I agree with Titanic that...

A little bit of an aside: Mods, either keep the 'Moderating decisions' forum up-to-date or scrap it. No one cares about spammers, (whose bannings are always listed), but when a 'regular' gets banned there's nothing mentioned. I wondered why southern_sid had been quiet and someone said he's...

No, keep it as it is. To be honest the biggest and most irritating tossers on here are Brighton fans, not the away ones. We've got Childish Ramblings for the piss-take threads, maybe the annoying posters (Brighton as well) could be confined there? Remove their posting priviliges from the main...