Search results

Completely agree and, as I said earlier, I don't think for a second Tony Bloom would do anything to put the club's future at risk. The comment about individuals owning clubs is a more general football thing. I think we are very lucky to have someone like Bloom as our owner. If a club has to be...

Would be interesting to know the exact details. As I said, I don't think Tony Bloom would do anything to put this club at risk. Not for a second. It is just in general I don't like the idea of a football club - or any institution so important to a local community - being basically owned by one...

I like Tony Bloom. I never realised he was THAT minted that he could basically wave goodbye to the best part of £150million. Surely there could potentially come a time though when he might not so be well off and might need some, if not all, of his original investment back. If not, brilliant...

Thanks for explaining it. Say we got promoted next season and benefited from the Premier League TV cash, do you think the club would suggest paying back part of the loan early to Tony Bloom even if he did not ask for it? I don't think I would be alone in thinking the bloke deserves some of...

No the club hasn't ever said that. Some fans on here do though. That was just an aside though. Was just genuinely interested to know when the club needs to start paying the millions back. As you say, I can't see us ever making much of a dent in it - interest free or not - unless we go up.

Thanks. We are very lucky to have a Tony Bloom type figure. That much is clear. Surely though he will want his money back eventually whether by loans being repaid or selling the club with his large number of converted shares?

I know a lot of people argue rising costs etc are necessary because, well, we have a £93million stadium to pay for. However, my understanding of the situation is that our current losses etc do no include any repayments to Tony Bloom for the loans he gave the club as they have no started yet. So...