Search results

Bollocks. You lot always stick your unwanted oars in all over the place.

This.

More sponsorship deals, revenue derived from the hotel planned at the Amex and more non-football events, I'd guess. Additionally, the academy effect and potentially have higher quality and higher value young players to promote to the first team and/or sell to bigger clubs.

It does not mean we are in debt to him. What it means is that the club has to develop sufficient ancillary revenue streams to fund future capital expenditure without relying on TB paying for it.

This obsession with our losses is quite bizarre. You go on as if we're the only club in the whole league losing money, when actually the vast majority of teams do.

1. We are not in debt to TB. I don't understand why you Palace idiots cannot get this fact into your thick skulls. 2. Whilst TB is a professional gambler, that is not how he made his money and massively underplays his strengths and competencies. Other than that, spot on.