Search results

Well obviously we differ on what's acceptable. But personally I'm fed up of people making excuses for people because they're a footballer or because they're young. We all take responsibility for our actions, you make your bed you lie in it. My view on what's right or wrong isn't going to be...

Becasue I read their testimonies as reported in the national press at the time. Testimonies that included them admitting cetain behviour.

I'm not trying to pick a fight on this, but lets not forget that fact that they didn't deny taking pictures of that girl and posing with her, now imagine that was your daughter, are you happy to regard that as foolish behaviour or would you rather describe that as scumbabg behaviour.

It does if you do what they did.

The club made the decision at the time and granted it would be farcical to get rid of Dunk now because of that incident. But I thought at the time they should have looked to offload him (not sack). In regards to being involved in something he didn't do that's another point. You are completely...

On that basis I do yeah, and I think it's right. Dunk let himself down and he admitted. I also think Dunk's overated.

The players were not guilty of sexual assault, that's fine. However what wasn't disputed in the trial even by them was that they acted like collosall w*****s. You can be not guilty and still be a scum bag. They dragged the name of the club through the mud and gave us a reason to dislike players...