Search results

Why ask the questions in your first post when you have the answers for your opinion in your second - you didn't need any further info. Anyway both you and drew seem to be confusing two arguments here. I've not stated the Queen has some definitive power to legislate or interfere with...

Good old semantics to back out of a previous statement. They're always there when you need them. I didn't state the Queen's role was purely ceremonial, I also didn't state she changes laws without going back to parliament. You seem to be reading only what you want to read.

I didn't expect you to read the links so I guess we're even.

Do some research and report back. I’ve posted links to further reading already. :thumbsup:

Not just that the Queen was able to amend and alter legislation to suit Royal requirements, these amended versions were not presented to members as having been altered, so our elected officials were often unaware a previous version had been changed for the purpose of suiting the Queen...

Im suggesting the possibility that he wasn’t just manipulated by his wife. Why is him living off it anymore stinky than what the rest of the Firm get up to? :shrug:

It's amazing the narrative that Prince Harry, someone who served in the military, got his hands dirty by all accounts, is the poor weak minded man led away by his manipulative partner. Not that he might have his own mind and it was all his idea...

And amendments it would seem before giving her consent... https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jun/27/queen-secret-influence-laws-revealed-scottish-government-memo Not to mention being immune from laws that apply to the rest of us...

Royal family in idiots shock.