Yeah I think so. Reason being so many balls from Woakes and Archer have been wicket taking deliveries. Felt India batted poorly yesterday, but this spell from Woakes and Archer, every ball has had something in it.
They know through testing the margin for error isn't that large, so in your scenario above completely missing, even with margin for error the technology can be trusted. This margin for error is less than half the width of the ball, hence it's umpires call either way if less than half the ball is...
The technology is showing the ball hitting, but isn't 100% accurate as it is predicative. If less than half the ball hitting the stumps, don't think you can argue with the on-field call, because in reality the technology has a margin for error. Think cricket now has this working well with the...
Seems a bit daft to me in effectively a knockout finals tournament, where games get rained off and not replayed, that you don't decide a tie on points firstly on the result between the two teams.
It's typical cricket that you need a bit of a maths formula, and a calculator to work out a fairly...