2 teams around us where the quality rather than coaching really made the difference. Newcastle, who were struggling first half of the season signed Almiron for £21.6m who pretty much transformed the way they play. Forget tactics, coaching, that quality changed them. Similarly Bournemouth signed...
The implication being they haven't had decent coaching, which is hell of a statement.
Managing and coaching can be completely separate entities. Tactically we may have got things wrong, Hughton may have man managed players badly, but now to say they haven't had decent coaching either, it's just...
So really, you're just applying good coaching having an impact when it suits your argument, basically.
Quite easy to say that players from another team whom I presume you don't watch week in week out have been improved to the top of their ability, but our own players haven't. Just a subjective...
So in your eyes the likes of Duffy, Dunk, March, Knockeart, Gross, Murray, Stephens haven't improved under Hughton? Are they not all considered decent PL players that would be all be sold for handsome sums over what we paid for them? Didn't Kayal cost under £1m? Murray has more goals than Josh...
Sorry, but remind me in Murray's excellent career when he scored more goals in the top flight than under Hughton? Did Smuggy make him better, he had him as a 31 year old?