Search results

And the ayes have it..... 26 civilians dead, including 7 children, possibly more dead in the rubble. Bombing eh. History tells us it works...right!? http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/07/syrian-civilians-killed-us-airstrike?CMP=share_btn_fb

You did say 'avoidance scheme' that suggested a tax avoidance vehicle operating some complex but legal tax avoidance. All Benn did was change the way his money was left in his will. It's just tax planning, a long way from avoidance.

So are facts....

Simply tax planning. No schemes, just using rules about who you leave your estate to in your will. Even the Torygraph outlined how legitimate his planning was as advice to their own readers. We've done the same with our wills without getting too personal, there is no 'scheme' in simply outlining...

In Iraq we've supported a government and their military in taking back control of their country - in principle at least, not altogether successful obviously. So the destruction of IS in Iraq, or defeating them in certain locations will mean control is taken back by an entity you can deal with...

Whoops sorry, I see what you've done there. Well done our PM on the most idiotic comment so far...

Well done on the most idiotic post so far. *not Tarpon though....

Does anyone think bombing will work, seriously? How much collateral damage is acceptable? http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/21/kunduz-hospital-attack-even-in-20-years-we-wont-get-such-a-hospital-again