Search results

Indeed - cost benefit analysis is an integral part of Network Rail's narrative risk assessments. And rightly so.

Yes, they do make sense. Reduced usage doesn't really count against keeping it open - for two reasons really. Firstly it was still popular and well used until Network Rail unlawfully padlocked the gates, and secondly - the closure request was under s118/119A Highways Act - 'for public safety'...

Reduced usage - therefore fewer 'train/pedestrian interactions' Better sightlines (vegetation removal) Better signage/gates Solar lights showing the crossing at night A Stop Line.

And this is why we have public inquiries. I know some posters have queries why stuff is just being rehashed / gone over again - but the point is to get to the bottom of what people were thinking when they made decisions, so that recommendations about future actions can be made. In relation to...

But we knew that decades ago.