Search results

Or a few F35s at 100 million pounds per plane ( + running costs )

I have no idea, and cannot judge how likely that actually is.

The mad kremlin crook has 'far more' than us, but no other countries do unless you view the USA as a potential adversary.

The old USSR trick of parading fake ICBMs through Red Square :lolol:

Reminds me of the 'Yes, Prime Minister' reason for us having Nukes... :lolol: ( It's not because the Russians have them, it's because the French have... )

You mean just Russia - China has about the same number of warheads as the UK. The thing is the number of warheads becomes a little meaningless as a deterrent over a certain threshold, providing the missiles remain hidden from first strike. No extra deterrence in turning radioactive dust into...

No, but I think the mad kleptocrat in the Kremlin actually would be, and if he ever invades the Baltics and starts thinking of a city to point his nukes at ( in order to threaten NATO against liberating them ), he won't be choosing London, Paris or a US one. [ He has form for this don't...

A very dangerous assumption

Good timing, Vladimir Corbyn... http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/609055/North-Korea-nuclear-strike-direct-Britain-war-Jeremy-Corbyn-Trident-deterrent