Search results

Yes, life seemed much simpler when all everyone had to argue about was whether Barnes is shit or not.

Yes I worded it slightly wrong. :blush: They want the specifics of the charges. This is not to be confused with the 500 page document that the LMA said in their statement is made up of lengthy appendices anyway and they have been sitting on before the 13th. In other words they and Gus...

Overview of verb particularise 1. specify, particularize, particularise, specialize, specialise (be specific about; "Could you please specify your criticism of my paper?")

It means they want the specifics,i.e the main points. They would have had the long winded version before the 13th.

It said they received it recently, no date given. It was particularised on the 13th which I think is just a summary of the charges, which they would have already known from the initial report.

I could understand a union man being present if Gus didn't fully know his rights in this, but after 5 weeks and presumably now in the hands of proper legal representatives one would think that this has gone beyond his union. Bevan needing to being there is just window dressing.

Gus h a legal team presumably to represent him does he not? Is Bevan a lawyer?

I wouldn't base too much on that statement, it seems the only person who couldn't actually make it today was Richard Bevan, who is just a union rep. Should the club be dancing to his tune? I think not.

A manager could be caught drowning kittens and the LMA would still put out a statement like this. Seems some are impressed though with their big words. :rolleyes: