Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. B

    [Cricket] Is it the end of Third Man ?

    Did you get upset when they changed fieldsman to fielder? I might start a campaign to change to bowlsman
  2. B

    [Cricket] Is it the end of Third Man ?

    I think it is what happened to Tommy Robinson. It is just a coincidence that he also tried to travel on false passports, committed fraud and ignored warnings about talking publicly about court cases (among other things). The police ignored all those small crimes and focussed on him saying he was...
  3. B

    [Cricket] Is it the end of Third Man ?

    Exactly. People accept a set of five which fundamentally changed the game from an over but kick off about a word used to describe a player. Incredible.
  4. B

    [Cricket] Is it the end of Third Man ?

    Slightly odd post. But you crack on. I have coached cricket for several years and we have one girl who is really good and plays in the boy’s team. For a while we have not said batsman. It is very simple. “You are next to bat” “Who is batting at the other end” I don’t particularly like the...
  5. B

    [Cricket] Is it the end of Third Man ?

    It was a term hardly used in 2000 because the language had evolved before the laws. This time the laws are changing before some people feel ready for it. I simply can’t compute people moaning about a change. Some of the Aussie comms deffo used the term during the 90s. Richie benaud being the...
  6. B

    [Cricket] Is it the end of Third Man ?

    I don’t remember people kicking off back in 2000 when the laws of the game changed from referring to fielder instead of fieldsman. It is almost like people are being convinced to kick off about something that really doesn’t matter. Imagine being a person that got angry about whether someone was...
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here