Search results

Is that £50k per showing a cost per match or the original outlay spread over a season or two as surely it cannot cost us that much each game at The Amex.

Lack of suitable location or the number of seats that they would lose due to the vision etc.

Didnt realise it would be that expensive but even so it is cheaper than some of their failed transfer purchases. What player could they buy for £500k.

I didnt realise until reading it earlier today that neither Old Trafford nor Anfield have got big screens perhaps they think it will reduce the number of seats available but if VAR was brought in and the review shown what would it cost them to install them, next to nothing really.

I am not suggesting the whole incident be shown on the big screen but I do believe that if it was offside a line shown as per normal tv showing this to be so or a hand ball or foul a frozen still picture of the incident be shown. Fouls etc shouldnt be opinion based but down purely to the laws...

In order for VAR to work efficiently I think that the ultimate and final decision with no further redress should rest with VAR and the decision reached within seconds rather than minutes. How this is achieved is up to the powers that be to sort out.

I dont understand why you said that, mind you I dont understand much of what you say, it must have been a sarcastic remark.. Any clubs that have large screens can show it and if it was agreed those that dont have them at the moment soon would have.

I do believe that the vital TV action which prompted the decision should be shown on the big screens as the decision is relayed.to the ref.

It was reported about a month ago that the ruling bodies not sure if it was EUFA or FIFA are insisting on its use.next season in all major senior leagues.including The Premier.