Search results

But it would seem that timing was outside of the law. as they hadnt entered the last hour unless you include the time between innings.

I understand but cannot see the point as I would think at 4pm if not earlier it was obvious a result wasnt going to be forthcoming.

With reference to my earlier question at what time was the result declared as a draw in relation to the closing time of the game.

So in theory Sussex declare at tea at 250 for 1 Leicesterhire then have to bat for an hour or am I reading this wrong could they say at tea we shall never get that and agree to call it a draw.which seems to be against the law as shown above.

That was my point and as an example we are 280 ahead at teatime the likelihood of either side forcing a win is very small. Then it seems pointless to continue

What is the earliest times the captains can agree a draw assuming Sussex dont get bowled out quickly. It seems pointless going to close if we are still in bat.

Just looked at the scores on BBC and expected a couple of wickets as we are supposed to be loaded with good bowlers but alas we dont seem to be able to remove ether Cosgrove or Ackerman

I do not profess to be an expert but do like proper cricket not the village green stuff.

Is this the same Sussex who people were saying 10 days ago had a very weak batting line up?