Search results

Step forward Mr Loophole with your theory.

Noticed in the red tops Nick (Mr Loophole) Freeman preparing the defence for Ant. He said there must be doubt as to who was driving and the police must prove it was Ant as usually the driver is taken to the station tested and charged. As that didnt happen the police must have doubts. I...

[/B] I did this on the day of my stag party 25th June 1965 and to this day I cannot remember which pub I left it at I thought it was opposite The Swan but have never found the car. It was a dark blue A40 Devon that I bought that morning from Triad Engineering in Brighton drove it to...

I think that like my earlier suggestion of having to take a test to get their licence back would mean the same more and more unlicensed and subsequently uninsured drivers on the road..

Some years ago it was a known fact that police went around the car parks of pubs in Worthing like The George and Mulberry and put one of those little round stickers on the nearside headlight. They then sat up the road and watched for the slight break in the headlight beam coming towards them...

Was not having a pop at you but quoting what many people I have heard say when in the pub.

If convicted D & D drivers had to retake their test to get their licence back would this just bring about more drivers without a licence and subsequently no insurance.

I was as I am sure that he will employ somebody like Nick (Mr Loophole)Freeman

I would think that his smart lawyer earning minimum wage will state that he was on medication which unbeknown to him or his advisers. took him over the D & D limit and due to his charity work shouldnt be banned.

They just said on the news Ant going back into rehab and this weeks show cancelled, I suppose that is a plus, but that is his defence sorted then.

That was said as a generalisation and I must admit I fell into that category until about 1995 until I was diagnosed with mouth cancer and decided the law of averages said that I would get done and due to the cancer had to change my life pattern so one night said that is it and I havent done it...

Is it not up to the law makers to make these defences inadmissable as you said such as spelt his name wrong how does that have an affect on the evidence if the correct person is in the dock. If they said it happened Franklynn Rd Haywards Heath but was by the hospital in Lewes Rd ok but not if a...

No there isnt and one Chief Constable wanted to act on 1 mph over the limit but was shouted down by his fellow officers as it being impractical.

That is not zero as has been advocated I was thinking more like zero but not acting under 5 micrograms which is hardly any drink I would think.

Are they guaranteed to be as accurate as official tests?

Being in the front line what is your personnal view of a zero level, not general police view should you differ.

I think the zero reading is being stated as whatever the standard measuring appliance shows as zero, at least it does in my estimation. Like the lee way on speeding there could be a minimal tolerance which would not entail prosecution.

An efficient 100% accurate home breathalyser should be available with it stipulated that having passed it would no be acceptable as defence evidence.as obviously somebody could get their young child to blow in it but it should be available as guidance.

I do not.

It is straight after but nothing can be done about the next day other than do not drive for 36 hours which for most is impractical.