Search results

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

  1. B

    Marshall/Murphy/Buckley/Bennett

    Both Buckley and Noone were good for us at the time but not now so thanks but no thanks to either of them coming back.
  2. B

    Marshall/Murphy/Buckley/Bennett

    I would be more than happy to have EB back either signed or on loan. What has happened to the Iranian winger has he signed for any team?
  3. B

    Marshall/Murphy/Buckley/Bennett

    Why leave out one of our best and most influential players last night and signing a winger and keeping March in the side, strange thinking.
  4. B

    Marshall/Murphy/Buckley/Bennett

    I have no dislike of Ince but unlike many on here I do not see him as another Yaya Toure. I believe that his best position is as a defensive midfielder, which is the position Bridcutt would occupy if he returned. Many times last season I said our best option in front of the back four was...
  5. B

    Marshall/Murphy/Buckley/Bennett

    We tried Kazenga central last year and it didnt work he is at his best going wide and running at the full back. Why would we want to play Ince if we re sgned Bridcutt by all means sign LB and push Kayal and Stephens forward but not Ince. You are right about Buckley and March though so...
  6. B

    Marshall/Murphy/Buckley/Bennett

    He signed it when he returned from his loan here but did say in his final radio interview that anything was possible in football and nothing should be ruled out or assumed.
  7. B

    Marshall/Murphy/Buckley/Bennett

    Because we have allegedly had good offers turned down for the other players and we kniw what we will get with Buckley and Bennett, more a safety first approach rather than take a chance and I feel that both could solve our wide man problem at a reasonable cost.
  8. B

    Marshall/Murphy/Buckley/Bennett

    In our position I would go for either of the Bs Buckley or Bennett depending on price/loan availability.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top