Kandi played for us as a trialist and they must have seen enough to give him a 2 year contract. My point is that it was most unlikely that Fenelon would have come on last game and turned it around so an unlikely unknown sub may have worked we had nothing to lose and plenty to gain.
This was based on their respective up bringing. Fenelon has shown he is not ready for the first team but still he was on the bench on Saturday due to very little option. We had a similar situation some years ago when an unknown striker was pushed onto the bench, a certain Peter Ward...
What is rubbish an 18 year old from Chelsea now in our developement squad with a 2 yr contract compared to a 20 year old only ever played for Tonbridge Angels, Torquay on loan and our DS, any difference? Kandi is said to be very quick, something we are missing, and for 10 mins what was there...
Scored 1 in 12 games for Torquay and could not make the bench for Rochdale in Div 1 so not that brilliant stats. What makes anybody think he could do it for us in The Championship if needed against Rotherham on Saturday.
Would SH done better to have thrown Chike Kandi on the bench against Rotherham rather than Fenelon who should be at Lewes or Worthing. Kandi must have something about him to have been at Chelsea.