Search results

That would be for CH to decide who would serve us better, if we still needed a striker.

Even if she is what most men class as a 'slag' does that mean she can be raped at will?

I do not know him, only as per media coverage, so would neither like nor dislike him if found not guilty. As far as playing for BHA if not guilty and CH and his team think he would benefit us I would accept their judgement. Prior to this case he isnt somebody I had paid much attention to...

My hope is that the truth comes out and this Ched Evans saga can be put to bed finally. If found guilty again put him back in side if not let him resume his career at the best available level.

Acker 79 It is the 5th parapraph about 17th line in The Purpose of Legal Guidance. I would be interested in your interpretation.

Thanks for clearing that up. So what about the highlighted piece in my post above yours? How do you interpret that?

Extract from the Guidance of Law as highlighted by Drew.in post no 2473 and is contained in the opening paragraphs The Legal Guidance does not create any rights enforceable at law, in any legal proceedings. This would indicate that this is a guide to judges not obligatory and the 1 sentence...

The punishment is the same Life Imprisonment. The suggestions made by the judge as to the length of life is one that the Home Secretary can accept or reject. Hasnt the EU said that such recommendations are illegal and we have been brought to task over them.

All murders are the same and receive the same punishment, the only one a judge can give Life Imprisonment. Other killings can be classified differently ie manslaughter unlawful killing etc. Murder is murder and a life sentence.

You are probably correct I was assuming that if an appeal was granted it would only be so if they considered it highly likely that the conviction was dangerous and would be overturned but perhaps they do not look at it so logically and base their decisions more on possibility than probability...

Just to make this perfectly clear I was making the suggestion about training with us being subject to the CCRC granting him an appeal which if granted I would expect to be heard very quickly.

My view was that if granted an appeal would be fast tracked. Perhaps not the best idea but are we overflowing with cash and choice?

That is the criteria that he should be measured by.

Yes I fully accept that but an appeal will only be granted if those responsible consider he has sufficient grounds to suggest a miscarriage of justice. As I have said all along if they decide no appeal then forget the whole thing. I would think that if an appeal is granted he will be...

It is easier to store water in a a net than get something through to you. IF AN APPEAL WAS GRANTED

Did you ever go to school and learn to read. I said the decision on allowing an appeal is due within a couple of weeks IF IT WAS GRANTED allow him to train that would be in some 7 weeks time which time an appeal if it was going to be held would be on the system.

I fully understand what you are saying but IF an appeal is granted and successful he becomes the same and as guilty as the family man sitting next to you. As I have said if he failed just scrub it and surely our principles would have been shown to be of the highest order, conviction no...

To me all crimes that are punished in the same manner are equal. I can never understand the people who say that the death penalty should be be brought back for the murder of certain groups of people. To my way of thinking all murders are equal, a life was taken. We as people are saying...

We shall have to wait to see as 2 clubs have made moves in the past.

We will forget my idea then but I am sure that some club will consider it just wait and see who in preseason training.