Search results

No male or female would be employed where I work with visible tattoos.

Which means you have been interviewed by companies that tolerate tattoos, as has been stated on here many companies will not employ people with visible tattoos. I think a lot of those people in the original article from the BBC are probably using this as an excuse.

So what if you are self-employed, a massive rock star or obscenely paid Premiership player ?

I very nearly added Easyjet but did think they might be different, no doubt the lefties will ensure at some point employers cannot advise things like no tattoos visible.

Many employers, that want their staff to represent them and their brand / image will naturally discriminate against a person with visible tattoos as opposed to without in work uniforms. Would you every see Virgin Atlantic or BA employ an air hostess who had massive visible tattoos ?

It is perfectly easy to have a tattoo in a place that is non-visible at work