Genuine question, but was he forthright with this opinion when writing for the papers he writes for?
Edit: All good, a quick google suggests he has talked about it a fair bit.
There was also one that went something like: If you came in an Alfa you would have walked half the way. The other half would have been some of the best driving of your life though.
Ah fair enough, thanks for clarifying.
Yes I agree both do react the same way. I must say though that I am seeing much more of one than the other at the moment.
Yep, it's both extremes that do this. All while pretending it is the other side. I don't have much time for either, it's hard to have any kind of discussion with such people.
Me?
I am not easily offended, nor have I used such tactics to stifle debate. I'll leave that to WWW and the others.
I rarely call other posters names and enjoy a discussions with people who disagree with me.
I did call Clarkson a bellend and I stand by that. Not because I find him offensive...
I'm not sure if it is straight talking. I think he worries a lot about wording everything correctly in order to upset as many people as possible.
As so many threads I haven't seen anyone suggest they are offended by him. Despite his best efforts 🤣
I love how the discussion has morphed into, 'is he actually a bellend or just pretending to be one?'
Either way it's not great is it?
Can we change the poll options? 🤣🤣
This, I suspect that he has found a way to be outrageous and offensive for money and exposure and he is milking it. Sometimes as he dances around the line he steps over it and goes too far.
Either that or he is actually a bellend and just happened to get paid handsomely for it.
Certainly makes...