Not sure what you are on about here.
Of course they do its called a discussion (well with some people anyway)
Glad we agree on something
There is plenty of money you just need a government that has the desire and wherewithal to get it.
I haven't attacked one party over another. I talked about the ruling classes of which JRM is a part. Red or Blue, matters little to me.
In my lifetime I have not seen a government that puts the people it represents high enough up its priorities list.
Is this really the best you have got?
You made an incorrect assumption (in a pretty arrogant way i will grant you) about my post and got called out on it. it happens move on.
I think he should have said that food banks were a catastrophe in a first world economy and that he and his party have failed to provide a decent enough economy to ensure that people have enough money to live on. I would also like him to say that he has failed both the people who needed to visit...
I agree, except that I don't think they do pander to the masses, I suspect that things might be far better if they did. The masses vote them in but their interests are way down the priorities list.
I think that one of the ruling classes commenting on foodbanks, when it was their policies that made them a necessity is crass beyond belief. Do I think that he takes any joy from the fact that charities are being forced to clean up his mess? Yes I do think that that is a realistic thing to...
I disagree here, I think the criticisms of the Conservatives you state here are entirely based on their policies. Just because some Tories are the living epitome of those policies is merely coincidence.
It is up lifting when charities save him from spending tax-payers money on poor people when he should be using it to feather the nest of his cronies.
How anyone can suggest, or support someone who suggests that food banks being in use is uplifting is beyond me. It does make me laugh how deep...