OK, not sure what the date has to do with anything, but I included it because it was available. My point was that a poster on here is a current director and is posting defensively/positively about the trust. Until I'd been on Companies House I hadn't realised that could be a significant bias to...
I wasn't making any inferences between Nick and salary paid to the Chief Exec, apologies if it came across like that. They were 2 separate points of note I gained from the accounts.
I also found it interesting that wages of one person was more than half of the total expenditure.
Some info from Companies House for 2015 filings:
Nick Szczepanik was appointed a director in April 2105.
Income £80.6k
Expenditure £77.3k
Expenditure includes wages paid to 1 person for £40k, an increase of 7% from previous year
Having just Checked Companies House and seeing the list of directors, it's become very clear why a certain poster is being very defensive about the trust...