Search results

I ****ing hope he is. It is so ****ing obvious that we need a striker who can (a) score, and (b) has some kind of physical presence... although not to Sami (allegedly)...

Agreed again!

Agreed!

Why? He is definitely our most creative player, if very erratic. Certainly would struggle to do worse than Tex has since his first few games for us.

This. The ONLY one on Saturday.

There are different types of striker. Just like there are different types of midfielder. Would you play, for example, McCourt in Holla's position!? Greer in Bruno's!?

MoM 2 games running, so that kind of blows your argument out of the water.

His position is NOT and NEVER WILL BE lone striker. Ergo played out of position.

But still outscoring his 'superb' Albion striker rivals this season... and still has a better record in this division than all of them...

... and CMS better in the Championship (not great TBF).

CMS was out of position, as a lone striker, under Gus. Gus never played to his strengths.

CMS 3. Baldock 1. Same squad.

Another 'ball towards' comment from JC when we make a forward pass. Why can't it be 'ball to feet of'?

So far, he very much is worse than CMS... he has contributed the grand total of **** all.

Too right. There is nothing in Sam B's track record, or first few games for us, to suggest he will be the answer to our striker problems. That said, I very much hope I'm wrong.

I really hate those who live in the past. Such a moot point.

I certainly have not said I want us to lose. I hereby go on record as wanting us to win. Today. And all future games. Thinking we will win many games under Sami is, based on the evidence so far, naive IMHO. 'Putting a boot through the hull' is just plain wrong. Pointing out the obvious...

Yes, and that was true. However, his plan 'A' was very effective the vast majority of the time. Shame he was/is a major t0sser.