Search results

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

  1. B.W.

    Kane?

    I agree with this BG. HKFC misconstruing again! ;-)
  2. B.W.

    Kane?

    I don't need to. You had an unnecessary dig at CMS, for example: "CMS might, as Bens Grandad suggests, get a game or two in place of Buckley / Lua lua in one of the wide roles. He is really not a good enough player to convince Oscar to completely re-draw his philosophy and system. Never going...
  3. B.W.

    Kane?

    This.
  4. B.W.

    Kane?

    LoL! I think we are violently agreeing, although I think you may find Oscar being more flexible than you expect with playing 2 upfront.
  5. B.W.

    Kane?

    I disagree. Barnes as backup replacement to Ulloa, yes. 2nd striker; that has to be CMS, precisely because of his strengths as compared to Barnes.
  6. B.W.

    Kane?

    Actually, I agree with you that Barnes is better than CMS as a single striker, but that is not what I was saying, as you well know, so... ... I suggest you read my posts more carefully and/or don't deliberately misconstrue what I am saying.
  7. B.W.

    Kane?

    So you think Barnes playing off of Ulloa is better than CMS doing so! OK. Fair enough. I disagree.
  8. B.W.

    Kane?

    Barnes! Yeah, right.
  9. B.W.

    Kane?

    Oh, and Gus had NOT s single clue how to play CMS. Here's hoping Oscar has a better idea how to use him, which is, as I said earlier, playing off of Ulloa.
  10. B.W.

    Kane?

    How unbalanced is your assessment of CMS!? Shocking. Yes, of course, if you compare him, or any other Championship striker for that matter, to Defoe, then he comes out 2nd best. But he WAS our top scorer last season (playing about 20 games), and deserves some respect from his club's alleged...
  11. B.W.

    Kane?

    CMS WILL play off of Ulloa.
  12. B.W.

    Kane?

    Spot on!
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top