https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code/rules-for-pedestrians-1-to-35
Works both ways. Say IF she was on her mobile phone, she wasn't adhering to the highway code. Even if she didn't look properly she has to have some (and I'd rather not use the word) blame for the accident. Just playing...
So at every lights you stopped, looked in front of you and behind you counting all the cyclists, rather than looking at the lights? Are you sure the lights hadn't changed and cyclists were going through green while you were busy standing there counting? Surely it's fairly busy at London traffic...
1) He had back brakes.
2) It wasn't a 2 tonne car and there was no mobile phone.
3) It was just a kid on a bike trying to swerve past a pedestrian that hadn't looked (as I read it).
You want ifs? If she hadn't walked out into the road and walked back into him she'd be alive. If with extra...
It's 19 year old kid on a bike, you use your back brake first then your first in an emergency. He said he swerved away from her but she, having not looked in the first place it sounds, walked back into his path. Why you're bringing a car into it I don't know, why not a bus? A tank? A hot air...
Did he jump lights? I haven't read he did. He was going about 10-18 miles an hour and the woman walked into the road so it's an accident as far as I see it. He might have clumsily written on a forum to defend himself from a witch hunt, but is that enough to ruin a second life as well the first...