Search results

But it won't be, will it? Because the money they get from West Ham will be pumped into paying the wages of match day staff for west ham, upkeep of west ham's changing rooms, clearing the paths around the concourse in bad weather, the undersoil heating and floodlights, security, cleaning and pest...

But if we left it vacant, we wouldn't have to pay 255m to convert it. So, the taxpayers are 270m out of pocket there. If West Ham aren't paying for matchday staff, concourses clearances, etc doesn't that mean the money for that comes via taxpayers? Putting us further out of pocket? West Ham...

Has anyone asked West Ham to explain how they think this benefits the taxpayer, or do they just let them claim it does and leave it at that?