Search results

What happened to the buy out that was rumoured late last season? Is that still ongoing, were the rumours overstated, or have the potential investors moved on?

All those cliches are true, but it doesn't make their decision right. A wrong decision is a wrong decision. It may be an understandable mistake to make, but it is still a mistake.

Funny how it's only palace fans that agree with them.

It's not about overhead kicks not being illegal, that's merely a side issue. It's about your interpretation of the event being a foul just because the foot was above head height, which is as wrong as the suggestion it's not a foul if there's no contact. The reason it wasn't a foul is because...

No it's not. It's the same as overhead kicks (which would all be illegal under your interpretation of the law), it's about how safe it is in that moment to raise your foot (regardless of contact). I've only seen one replay of it, but it seemed like the palace player was not in danger of getting...