Search results

I don't think it makes much difference, all you're adding is more variables with which to judge the player, making it less likely that the list of target solely contains players who will make the team better. Instead of getting a fully formed player who is not as good as who you have, you get...

First we convert to a rugby team or relocate to Scotland...

Not necessarily. When you have one player in a specific position, let's say left back. You have one. You need someone else. Since the one you have was signed to get you out of league one into the championship but has been exposed a few times you want someone better, or at least a second choice...

The club deemed brezovan and ankergren good enough, they signed him, gave him an extension when we got to the championship, so why did we bother signing kuszczak? Because he is better. A manager needs the best players if we expect the best out of him. If we're not getting the best players for...

I certainly hope that isn't true. I don't want a manger having the final say on whether we buy someone or not, since their concern is the current team and not the long term health of the club, and it isn't their money they are spending. It also doesn't tally with Tony Bloom saying that the...

The problem is that the club don't (and can't, realistically) provide irrefutable proof that the manager/head coach has the sort of input people would feel comfortable with. This is easily dismissed as 'just the club spinning things'. The phrase the OP uses ("No one is signed without input from...