But that would be immediately eaten up by the money we would have to spend to bring in a second striker so we had back up for Lita.
Selling him in January, fine I get that and the finances issue. But cms and ulloa aren't due back until late November early December, and then they'd need a few...
That might explain it, but why would we loan out one of our only two strikers, with the other on loan to us, after it took so long to get a second striker in?
How does that make sense? Loan to buy? Why would they do that when they know his contract expires at the end of the season? They'd either buy him outright, or just loan him. Then sign him in the summer having had those few months to convince him burnley is the place for him.