Search results

For those of you who haven't seen the full guest list, here it is (although it should be pointed out that this is the invite list, whether they attended or not is not recorded). https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jan/24/guest-list-presidents-club-all-male-charity-gala

Well nobody who was there has said it's not true. It was clearly true enough to cause an elected representative to go before the PM to beg to keep his job, to force several people to resign from posts, to close the club down and for the compere to apologise for his role in it. None of those...

I'm pointing out that you have no evidence to back up your argument, whereas I do. You don't like that evidence but it remains more than you have provided. So I go back to the question I originally asked you when you said you wanted a counter-argument and balance. What is the counter-argument...

How many people who were there have come out and said there was categorically no sexual harassment going on?

Yes, the only person who has said it was the person who was there. Loads of people who weren't there have said there was no sexual harassment. You're right, what was I thinking...

Nor does the royal wedding. Doesn't stop it being plastered all over the front pages every other day. The counter argument being (presumably) that sexual harassment is OK?

"Journalist" Camilla Long claimed this wasn't news or important. She got told in no uncertain terms she was wrong. https://www.thepoke.co.uk/2018/01/24/replies-journalist-satisfying-things-presidents-club-story/

I like the way "snowflake" seems to have become the go-to derogatory term for people who believe in things like basic human decency and "not being a prick 24/7". Forgetting it only takes a few snowflakes to bring the whole of London to a grinding halt. And if there are enough of us you've got...