Search results

http://video.ft.com/4764197296001/Quiz-What-has-the-EU-done-for-Britain-/world - kinda fun.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

It is totally and completely unlike the Mail. There is a lot of fair and balanced information there. It is a good source with a good amount of detail. If they survey the facts as they see them and come to a consistent conclusion, perhaps that says more about the facts than about them. Both...

An editorial position would be one taken by the publication itself not their contributors. This is the editorial position " BrexitVote is a multi-disciplinary, evidence-based blog run by the London School of Economics and Political Science. Our aim is to inform the debate surrounding the...

They don't take an editorial position if that's what you're after. It's analysis - which is why it's a good neutral website. This analysis (skimmed) seems somewhat unimpressed with DC's negotiations...

This one takes it seriously : http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexitvote/2016/02/15/what-are-the-uks-options-outside-the-european-union/

No one is free from bias, and I'm sure LSE has an institutional slant, but I don't think that would lead them to suppress the positive impacts of Brexit or accentuate the negative impacts.

It has academic standards to maintain.

At some point you can either take the PM, France, Belgium, the Chancellor and whoever else at their word or you can say "haha! I won't fall for your sly political tricks, I demand a better deal and I know what to do to get it!" Then we vote our and you say "So then, how about this new deal, I'm...

Pff no true democrat could possibly worry about Brussels when the House of Lords sits there unchallenged. ;)

Keep an eye on http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexitvote/ . Seems like sober, independent analysis.

It's interesting that you are able to hold that position when the exact opposite has been stated by the Government at every opportunity. I wonder how many stars have to align for the perfect post-Brexit scenario to take place.

It is somewhat perverse to talk about the EU being undemocratic when there are hereditary peers in the House of Lords.

Sorry should have included a link. They were referencing No 10. 11:58. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2016/feb/22/boris-johnson-cameron-eu-be-career-ending-his-father-claims-politics-live?page=with:block-56caf44ce4b0f2fd18cafe92#block-56caf44ce4b0f2fd18cafe92 "No 10 rules out...

Check the Guardian's live-blog today. It has been ruled out. Totally and completely - there is no round 2.