Yes ok the disrespectful comment is overplaying it somewhat. All I'm saying is I don't think it was appropriate for a few reasons. None of them particularly important and I don't feel particularly strongly about the whole thing so I'm not going to argue the point to the death especially given I...
...and 3 worse than newcastle who it's not inconceivable we may be competing for second with (or even the title).
and yes it's 12 better than fulham but it won't be that much if they catch us up on points.
Seriously? Because he's a professional and it's a bit disrespectful, he's paid alot of money and because it was a good opportunity and goal difference can be pretty important eg 15/16 championship table
stockdale 8
bruno 7
dunk 8
duffy 8
bong 8.5
knockaert 7
norwood 8.5
stephens 8
march 6
baldock 8.5
murray 5
four comments:
1. did knockaert try a rabona in the last minute? if so that was unnecessary
2. thought we won just about every header. ? very impressive
3. it was never a red card.
4...