Search results

True enough, many many more employment opportunities were indeed opened up to women during the war. There were even supervisory roles made available, to middle and upper class women of course.

Fair enough, but working class women were working their fingers to the bone long before the war came along. Personally I believe that direct action gives decision makers much more to think about and more often than not, speeds up change. The Suffragettes were very much a case of needs must.

Point of order: SOME women were given the vote in 1918. Do you believe that women's "contribution to the war effort" was a bigger influence in winning SOME women the vote than acts of 'terrorism'? I certainly don't.

Intersectionality perhaps??? Nah you're right, it's because the OP is a right winger who can't stop being terrified of Corbyn, despite buggering off to the other side of the world.